🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive a decisive European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Over System & Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.